Elon Musk Thinks Social Media Isn’t Rocket Science

When Elon Musk talks about making electrical vehicles, he seems like he is aware of what he’s speaking about, most likely as a result of he does. “We principally tousled virtually each side of the Mannequin 3 manufacturing line, from cells to packs to drive inverters,” he stated, earlier this month, throughout an onstage interview on the TED convention in Vancouver. “I lived within the Fremont and Nevada factories for 3 years, fixing that manufacturing line, operating round like a maniac.” He spoke with confidence and with out hesitation, his eyes swinging back and forth as if he have been watching himself, in his reminiscence, striding purposefully throughout his manufacturing facility ground. “At this level,” he concluded, “I feel I do know extra about manufacturing than anybody at present alive on earth.” The viewers applauded. They didn’t appear to doubt him.

When Musk talks about managing a platform for public discourse, he seems like he doesn’t know what he’s speaking about, most likely as a result of he doesn’t. The TED interview happened just a few hours after he’d introduced (on Twitter, after all) that he needed to purchase Twitter, Inc., in a hostile takeover, for what would quantity to about forty-four billion {dollars}. The primary query from the interviewer, Chris Anderson, was: why? Why would Musk, who already had each the world’s largest private fortune and several other consuming day jobs, wish to personal one other firm? “So, um, effectively, I feel it’s crucial for there to be an inclusive enviornment without cost speech,” Musk started. This drew an appreciative “whoop” from somebody within the viewers, however Musk didn’t appear inspired; he took a shallow breath, then shifted in his seat as he continued. “Twitter has turn into type of the de-facto city sq.,” he stated, “so it’s simply actually essential that individuals have each the fact and the notion that they can converse freely throughout the bounds of the regulation.” There are elements of this, akin to “de-facto city sq.,” that I might quibble with; as a place to begin, although, it’s completely high-quality. But it surely’s merely a place to begin—a little bit of throat-clearing, the half you get out of the way in which earlier than continuing to your bigger thesis. Musk didn’t appear to have a bigger thesis, or, if he did, he wasn’t prepared to share it.

Anderson requested just a few follow-up questions—not gotcha questions however elementary ones—and Musk fumbled most of them. “Proper now, Twitter and Fb and others, they’ve employed hundreds of individuals to attempt to assist make sensible selections, and the difficulty is that nobody can agree on what is sensible,” Anderson stated. “How do you remedy that?”

“Properly, I feel we might wish to err on the—if unsure, let the speech—let it exist,” Musk stated. “I’m not saying that I’ve all of the solutions right here.” If the one premise behind Tesla had been that vehicles ought to err on the facet of gas effectivity and easy dealing with, with none additional technical particulars or proofs of idea, the concept wouldn’t have been value a lot. Musk is an engineer who believes in trial and error, however free speech isn’t an engineering drawback. “Is somebody you don’t like allowed to say one thing you don’t like?” he continued. “If that’s the case, then we now have free speech.” That is, at greatest, an incomplete definition—hardly even a satisfactory use of TED’s thought-leader airtime, a lot much less a cogent rationale for a takeover bid equal to the G.D.P. of Turkmenistan. If Musk had presupposed to know extra about speech norms, penumbral rights, or Habermasian discourse ethics than anybody alive on earth, the viewers would have laughed in his face.

[Support The New Yorker’s award-winning journalism. Subscribe today »]

On Monday, Musk received what he needed. Inside the subsequent few months, if all goes as anticipated, Twitter will turn into a personal firm underneath his management. Musk, arguably probably the most profitable residing entrepreneur, might effectively have the ability to convert his hazy free-speech ideas right into a solvent enterprise, however he insists that that is irrelevant. “I don’t care in regards to the economics in any respect,” he stated in Vancouver—a wierd pitch from a man who was nonetheless attempting to safe investor financing, however probably a honest one. Moderately, he claimed that bolstering “the belief of Twitter as a public platform” can be a technique to lower “civilizational threat.” As of now, Twitter is fairly terrible. It’s definitely doable that Musk will make it higher. Neither is it unprecedented for a tycoon to regulate a de-facto city sq.—a lot of the Web is already managed by billionaires, faceless firms, or entities underneath the affect of the Chinese language safety state. “I hope that even my worst critics stay on Twitter, as a result of that’s what free speech means,” Musk tweeted on Monday. One drawback with that is that it’s not what free speech means. One other is that, even when it have been, Musk doesn’t have an unblemished report of following his personal recommendation. On Tuesday, Musk subtweeted stated critics, writing, “The intense antibody response from those that worry free speech says all of it.” It is a straw-man maneuver, a approach of shifting the talk: you say that you just disagree with me, however what you really imply is that you just worry free speech. Musk, or one among his many besotted reply guys, would possibly argue that free speech isn’t rocket science. That is true, not within the colloquial sense however within the literal sense: rocket science is a website through which Musk has demonstrated some experience.

At one level, Anderson requested about hate speech, and Musk replied that “Twitter ought to match the legal guidelines of the nation.” The US doesn’t have legal guidelines in opposition to hate speech. Quite the opposite, the Supreme Court docket has repeatedly dominated that the majority hate speech is protected by the First Modification. It’s my private view—and never a very edgy one—that there are some sorts of speech that shouldn’t be prohibited by the federal government, however that Twitter principally has to ban if it desires to flourish as a enterprise. You’re at present allowed, as you have to be, to face in a public park and shout, for instance, that every one synagogues needs to be burned to the bottom. You’re at present not allowed, as you shouldn’t be, to tweet the identical opinion. There are literally thousands of hypothetical examples like this, and new ones come up each day. I additionally assume—once more, not controversially—that the query of whether or not social networks needs to be designed to reliably incentivize and algorithmically amplify incendiary lies is distinct from the query of whether or not “misinformation” needs to be “censored,” and that these two questions will usually, albeit not all the time, yield completely different solutions. What does Musk take into consideration any of this? We don’t know, and, it appears, neither does he. “If Elon takes over Twitter, he’s in for a world of ache,” Yishan Wong wrote, earlier this month, in an extended tweet thread. “Elon goes to strive like heck to ‘repair’ the issues he sees. Every drawback he ‘fixes’ will simply trigger 3 extra issues. . . . it’s not simply going to suck up his time and a focus, IT WILL DAMAGE HIS PSYCHE.” Ten years in the past, when Wong was the C.E.O. of Reddit, he was one thing like a free-speech absolutist. He appears to have discovered the exhausting approach that, if absolutism was ever intellectually defensible, it’s not a tenable technique to run a platform.

In his 1989 e book “Liar’s Poker,” Michael Lewis famously referred to greed-is-good Wall Avenue bankers as “Large Swinging Dicks.” Elsewhere, I’ve argued that at present’s tech titans—who privilege the cerebral over the corporeal, who declare to disdain hedonism in favor of mental hubris, who consider themselves as epochal figures with civilization-bestriding legacies—ought to as a substitute be referred to as Large Swinging Brains. Musk, in some ways, is the most important of all of them—so large that he apparently can’t be bothered to learn a Wikipedia article on free speech earlier than mansplaining the idea to the world. It’s one factor to magnanimously promise that you just received’t silence your critics; it’s one other factor to have sufficient humility to take heed to them.